Bringing employment lawyers and barristers together with HR managers and employers to solve employment law issues.
Banner
Home Opinion Stuart Peters Limited v Bell
Stuart Peters Limited v Bell Print E-mail
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
Written by Nick Mallett   
Thursday, 26 February 2009 09:36

3 Kings’ Bench Walk North, London EC4Y 7HR

Stuart Peters Limited v Bell – the Norton Tool principle revisited

As readers of this section will be aware, the ‘narrow principle’ in Norton Tool Company Ltd v Tewson [1972] ICR 501, was held to be good law by the Court of Appeal in Langley v Burlo [2007] ICR 290, notwithstanding the doubt that had previously been cast on the principle by the House of Lords in Dunnachie v Kingston Upon Hull City Council [2004] ICR 1052.
subscribe_splash
Already a Subscriber ?
If you have an active subscription, please log in to view the article.
Comments
Only registered users can write comments!

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."
 

Bookmark with

Add to: JBookmarks Add to: Digg Add to: Del.icoi.us Add to: Reddit Add to: StumbleUpon Add to: Google Information
Halsbury House, 35 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1EL
Customer Services 0845 370 1234